按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率

陳捷

一级黄色片免费播放|中国黄色视频播放片|日本三级a|可以直接考播黄片影视免费一级毛片

留言板

尊敬的讀者、作者、審稿人, 關于本刊的投稿、審稿、編輯和出版的任何問題, 您可以本頁添加留言。我們將盡快給您答復。謝謝您的支持!

姓名

郵箱

手機號碼

標題

留言內容

驗證碼

按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率

陳捷

文章導航 > 電子與信息學報 > 1981 > 3(1): 16-21

陳捷. 按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率[J]. 電子與信息學報, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

引用本文:

陳捷. 按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率[J]. 電子與信息學報, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

Chen Jie. THE ERROR PROBABILITY OF DETECTING PHASE-MODULATEL BINARY CODES ON THE BASIS OF THE THRESHOLD DECISION RULE[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

Citation:

Chen Jie. THE ERROR PROBABILITY OF DETECTING PHASE-MODULATEL BINARY CODES ON THE BASIS OF THE THRESHOLD DECISION RULE[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

陳捷. 按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率[J]. 電子與信息學報, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

引用本文:

陳捷. 按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率[J]. 電子與信息學報, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

Chen Jie. THE ERROR PROBABILITY OF DETECTING PHASE-MODULATEL BINARY CODES ON THE BASIS OF THE THRESHOLD DECISION RULE[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

Citation:

Chen Jie. THE ERROR PROBABILITY OF DETECTING PHASE-MODULATEL BINARY CODES ON THE BASIS OF THE THRESHOLD DECISION RULE[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 1981, 3(1): 16-21.

按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率

陳捷

計量
- 文章訪問數(shù): 1754
- HTML全文瀏覽量: 119
- PDF下載量: 466
- 被引次數(shù): 0
出版歷程
- 收稿日期: 1979-04-25
- 刊出日期: 1981-01-19

THE ERROR PROBABILITY OF DETECTING PHASE-MODULATEL BINARY CODES ON THE BASIS OF THE THRESHOLD DECISION RULE

Chen Jie

摘要

摘要: 本文計算出偽隨機碼測距系統(tǒng)中按門限判決規(guī)則檢測調相二進碼時的錯誤概率,并與極大似然判決規(guī)則檢測的結果進行了比較。文章指出:在相同條件下,從統(tǒng)計平均角度來看,按門限判決規(guī)則與按極大似然判決規(guī)則檢測的結果相差不多;即使按最長捕獲時間計算,前者檢測結果也只不過比后者差3分貝。
Abstract: On the basis of the Threshold Decision rule calculations are made of the error probability of detecting phase-modulated binary codes in the system of Pseudo-random code for the measure of distance. The results are compared with results of measurements on the basis of the maximum likehood decision rule. It is pointed out that under similar conditions, results obtained from measurements according to the two rules from the point of view of statistical average differ very little; results obtained from the former differ only by 3dB from the later, even calculations are made according to the longest trapping time.